Understand the development opportunity
Objectives, location, project logic, end users, infrastructure needs, institutional and commercial context.
Output: concept assumptions & evidence registerNot every good idea is a good infrastructure investment. Our scientist-led, project-specific screening combines available evidence, data, market intelligence, engineering, technical and regulatory insight to help determine what should advance, what should change and what may not be worth pursuing.
Our aim is not to cut corners or eliminate necessary professional investigations. It is to identify key viability questions earlier so clients invest in a proportionate, sequenced programme of studies and approvals.
Target the specific market, site, science, technical and statutory uncertainties most likely to change the investment case.
Identify potential showstoppers such as unavailable land, grid or water access, critical habitat, safety exposure or permit incompatibility.
Consider different sites, technologies, routes, phasing and infrastructure configurations before selecting detailed study options.
Translate project-specific risks into an auditable preparation roadmap with evidence gaps, dependencies and mitigation priorities.
Each gate answers a defined project-development question. Its output determines what evidence is needed next.
Objectives, location, project logic, end users, infrastructure needs, institutional and commercial context.
Output: concept assumptions & evidence registerExisting geospatial and scientific data, demand signals, infrastructure access, land and servitudes, site suitability, legal permissions, HSESSG red flags.
Output: constraints, risks & initial decision gatesAppropriate technical, environmental, social, market, delivery and preliminary commercial models, calibrated to project data and maturity.
Output: options appraisal & decision-critical gapsGo: advance a targeted feasibility programme. Rework: change site, configuration, scale or phasing. Stop: pause an option where fundamental constraints remain unacceptable.
Output: documented, conditional development recommendationDetailed feasibility, ESDD, permit applications, engineering design, lender reviews, EPC interfaces, construction readiness, commissioning and operations.
Output: scoped preparation & delivery roadmapWe combine existing information and appropriate new investigation; no model can replace qualified engineering, field verification, statutory approvals or definitive lender due diligence.
Sector outlook, user demand, affordability, supply chains, market structure, demand uncertainty and alternative pathways.
Technology options, interfaces, infrastructure capacity, preliminary constructability, operating assumptions and phasing.
Hydrology, water availability, land use, biodiversity sensitivity, climate, emissions, waste and environmental constraints.
Community interfaces, land tenure, landowner liaison, social risks, localisation, resettlement triggers and benefit pathways.
Early cost drivers, funding assumptions, sensitivities and feasibility dependencies in collaboration with financial specialists.
Licensing, permits, wayleaves, HSESSG, quality requirements, sequencing, approvals and readiness for construction.
Explore how we apply the methodology within each infrastructure sector.
Share the concept, site, sector, market or service requirement and available information. Thero can discuss a fit-for-purpose developability screening and project preparation approach.